RODGERICK ANGELO SHOULDERS, JR.
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Rodgerick Shoulders was convicted of second-degree murder and other firearm offenses with enhanced sentences based on jury findings that he discharged a firearm. On appeal, the State conceded error because no evidence supported that Shoulders personally discharged the firearm, only that he possessed one, requiring reduction of his minimum mandatory sentences from 25 years to 10 years.
The trial court erred by imposing 25-year minimum mandatory sentences because no evidence supports that Shoulders personally discharged a firearm. Instead, Shoulders is entitled to 10-year minimum mandatory sentences under § 775.087(2)(a)1 for possession of a firearm, and the sentencing documents must be corrected accordingly without resentencing.
[1] A defendant is entitled to a new appeal regarding the weight of evidence supporting a firearm discharge finding when appellate counsel is found to be ineffective.
[2] A twenty-five-year minimum mandatory sentence for discharging a firearm during the commission of a felony is not supported by evidence that the defendant merely possessed…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“While the evidence supports a finding that Shoulders possessed a firearm, no evidence exists to support a finding that Shoulders personally discharged a firearm during the commission of the crimes.”
Establishes the core factual distinction—possession was proven but discharge was not—which mandates reversal of the enhanced sentences
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceShoulders was convicted of second-degree murder with a firearm, attempted felony murder with a firearm, and two counts of robbery with a firearm. The …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Second Degree Murder With A Firearm cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Rodgerick Angelo Shoulders, Jr. was convicted of second-degree murder with a firearm, attempted felony murder with a firearm and two counts of robbery with a firearm.
The jury made special verdict findings that Shoulders carried, used and discharged a firearm causing the death of one person, and great bodily harm to another. The trial court sentenced Shoulders to life in prison with a twenty-five-year minimum mandatory sentence for second-degree murder, a consecutive life sentence with a twenty-five-year minimum mandatory sentence for attempted felony murder, and concurrent thirty-year sentences with twenty-five-year minimum mandatory sentences for the robberies.1 On appeal, Shoulders argues that there is no evidence to support the jury’s finding that he discharged a firearm during the commission of his offenses. The State properly and commendably concedes error. The crimes occurred when Shoulders and an unidentified co-defendant attempted to steal marijuana and other items. While the evidence supports a finding that Shoulders possessed a firearm, no evidence exists to support a finding that Shoulders personally discharged a firearm during the commission of the crimes. Consequently, the trial court erred by imposing the twenty-five-year minimum mandatory sentences mandated by section 775.087(2)(a)3., Florida Statutes (2017). Instead, as Shoulders asserts, the trial court should have imposed the ten-year minimum mandatory sentences for possession of a firearm pursuant to section 775.087(2)(a)1.
On remand, the trial court shall correct the sentencing documents to reflect the ten-year minimum mandatory sentence. Resentencing is not necessary.
REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SENTENCING DOCUMENTS.
ORFINGER, EDWARDS and HARRIS, JJ., concur. 1 This Court affirmed Shoulders’s convictions and sentences without opinion.
Shoulders v. State, 249 So. 3d 644 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018). Shoulders then filed a petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, which we granted in part. Shoulders
v. State, 276 So. 3d 94 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019). We ordered a new appeal regarding the weight of the evidence that Shoulders discharged a firearm during the criminal episode.
Id. at 97, 98. 2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Rodgerick Angelo Shoulders, Jr. v. State, 249 So. 3d 644 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)