COLLEEN L. WHATLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
L.G. WHATLEY AND DAN G. WHATLEY, APPELLEES
COLLEEN L. WHATLEY, APPELLANT,
L.G. WHATLEY AND DAN G. WHATLEY, APPELLEES
504 So. 2d 27
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1987)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Ellison v. Anderson, 74 So. 2d 680 (Fla.1954); Cary v. Keene Corp., 472 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Elison v. Goodman, 395 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hockensmith v. State, 524 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)…e us is not one in which we are called upon to review the denial of a defendant’s request to be present where some “compelling circumstance” might justify the denial as an exception to the plain language of the statute and rule. See Brooks v. State, 504 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). The only evidence presented in the case before us that could possibly be construed as militating against transport is a letter by an attorney for the hospital4 containing a request that the defendant be out of the hospital for a…
Authorities Cited
- Ellison v. Johnson Anderson, 74 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 1954)
- Elison v. Goodman, 395 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- Cary v. Keene Corp., 472 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)