IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1.453

Fla. | 2023-03-30
No. SC2022-0803
Florida Supreme Court (2023)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court adopted new Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.453, which establishes procedures for trial courts when jurors request to review testimony during deliberations. The rule permits readback or playback of testimony in open court after notice to counsel, and allows courts to respond in writing to such requests in their discretion, while requiring notification that transcripts are unavailable.


Holding

The Court adopted new rule 1.453 establishing that trial courts may permit readback or playback of testimony in open court after notice to counsel, or may respond in writing in their discretion if parties have an opportunity to object. When jurors request transcripts, courts must inform them that transcripts are unavailable but that readback or playback may be requested at the court's discretion.


Headnotes

[1] A trial court may, in its discretion, respond in writing to a juror's request for a readback or playback of testimony, provided the parties have an opportunity to object…

[2] If a juror requests a readback or playback of testimony, the court must provide notice to counsel for the parties before proceeding.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“If a juror asks for a readback or playback of trial testimony, the trial court may, after giving notice to counsel for the parties, read or play back the testimony in open court.”

Establishes the primary procedure allowing courts to accommodate juror requests for testimony review in open court with party notice.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The Civil Procedure Rules Committee filed a report on June 20, 2022, proposing adoption of new Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.453 governing juror r…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the Court for consideration of proposed

amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. We have

jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const. On June 20, 2022, the

Civil Procedure Rules Committee (Committee) filed a report

proposing the adoption of new Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.453

(Jury Request to Review Testimony). This Court previously

published the proposed amendments for comment, and no

comments were received.

Having considered the proposed amendments, the Court

hereby adopts new rule 1.453 as proposed by the Committee. New

rule 1.453 articulates how trial courts are to proceed when a juror

in a civil case asks for trial transcripts or asks for trial testimony to be read or played back. If a juror asks for a readback or playback

of trial testimony, the trial court may, after giving notice to counsel

for the parties, read or play back the testimony in open court. In

the alternative, the trial court may, in its discretion, respond to the

request in writing, as long as the parties are afforded an

opportunity to place objections on the record. If a juror asks for

trial transcripts, the trial court must notify the jury that transcripts

are unavailable but that a request for a readback or playback may

be made and that such a request may or may not be granted at the

court’s discretion.

Accordingly, we hereby amend the Florida Rules of Civil

Procedure as reflected in the appendix to this opinion. New

language is indicated by underscoring. The amendments shall

become effective immediately upon release of this opinion.

It is so ordered.

MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, POLSTON, LABARGA, COURIEL, GROSSHANS, and FRANCIS, JJ., concur. THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS.

Original Proceeding – Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

-2-Landis V. Curry III, Chair, Civil Procedure Rules Committee, Tampa, Florida, Jason Paul Stearns, Past Chair, Civil Procedure Rules Committee, Tampa, Florida, Joshua E. Doyle, Executive Director, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida, and Heather Savage Telfer, Bar Liaison, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida,

for Petitioner

-3-APPENDIX

RULE 1.453. JURY REQUEST TO REVIEW TESTIMONY

(a) Request for Readback or Playback of Testimony. If, after retiring to consider their verdict, any juror requests a readback or playback of testimony, the jury may be conducted into the courtroom and the court may order the readback or playback of testimony. The testimony may be read or played back only after notice to counsel for the parties. Any readback or playback of testimony must be in open court in the presence of all parties. In its discretion, the court may respond in writing to a request for readback or playback of testimony without having the jury brought before the court, provided that the parties have received the opportunity to place objections on the record and both the request and response are made part of the record.

(b) Request for Transcripts. If any juror requests to have a transcript of trial testimony, the court must inform the jury that transcripts are not available but that they can request a readback or playback of testimony, which request may or may not be granted at the court’s discretion. If a juror makes only a general request for transcripts, as opposed to identifying any particular witness’s testimony that they wish to review, the court must also instruct the jury that, if they request a readback or playback, they must specify the particular trial testimony they wish to have read or played back. If, after being properly instructed in accordance with this subdivision, the jury requests a readback or playback of any trial testimony, the court must follow the procedures set forth in subdivision (a).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw