IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1.530 AND FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULE OF PROCEDURE 12.530

Fla. | 2022-08-25
No. SC22-756
346 So. 3d 1161 Florida Supreme Court (2022) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Filing a motion for rehearing is required to preserve for appeal a challenge to the sufficiency of a trial court's findings in a final judgment order.


Headnotes

[1] Filing a motion for rehearing is required to preserve for appeal a challenge to the sufficiency of a trial court's findings in a final judgment order.

[2] Amendments to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.530 and Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.530 clarify the requirement of filing a motion for rehearing to preserve o…

Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The Supreme Court of Florida, on its own motion, amended Rules of Civil Procedure 1.530 and Family Law Rules of Procedure 12.530. The amendments add a…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

On its own motion, the Court amends Florida Rule of Civil

Procedure 1.530 (Motions for New Trial and Rehearing;

Amendments of Judgments) and Florida Family Law Rule of

Procedure 12.530 (Motions for New Trial and Rehearing;

Amendments of Judgments). We have jurisdiction. See art. V,

§ 2(a), Fla. Const.; Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.140(d).

We have determined that amendments to these rules are

necessary to clarify that filing a motion for rehearing is required to

preserve an objection to insufficient trial court findings in a final

judgment order. Thus, the following sentence is added to rules

1.530(a) and 12.530(a): “To preserve for appeal a challenge to the sufficiency of a trial court’s findings in the final judgment, a party

must raise that issue in a motion for rehearing under this rule.”

Additionally, we add the following Court Commentary to both rules:

“The amendment to subdivision (a) does not address or affect, by

negative implication, any other instance in which a motion for

rehearing is or might be necessary to preserve an issue for appellate

review.”

Accordingly, we amend the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

and Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure as reflected in the

appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated by

underscoring. The amendments shall become effective immediately

upon the issuance of this opinion. Because the amendments were

not published for comment previously, interested persons shall

have seventy-five days from the date of this opinion in which to file

comments with the Court. 1

1. All comments must be filed with the Court on or before November 8, 2022, as well as a separate request for oral argument if the person filing the comment wishes to participate in oral argument, which may be scheduled in this case. If filed by an attorney in good standing with The Florida Bar, the comment must be electronically filed via the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal (Portal) in accordance with In re Electronic Filing in the Supreme Court of Florida via the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal, Fla. Admin. Order No. -2-It is so ordered.

MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, COURIEL, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur. THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS.

Original Proceeding – Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure

AOSC13-7 (Feb. 18, 2013). If filed by a nonlawyer or a lawyer not licensed to practice in Florida, the comment may be, but is not required to be, filed via the Portal. See In re Electronic Filing in the Florida Supreme Court, Fla. Admin. Order No. AOSC17-27 (May 9, 2017). Any person unable to submit a comment electronically must mail or hand-deliver the originally signed comment to the Florida Supreme Court, Office of the Clerk, 500 South Duval Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1927; no additional copies are required or will be accepted.

-3-APPENDIX

FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

RULE 1.530. MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL AND REHEARING; AMENDMENTS OF JUDGMENTS

(a) Jury and Non-Jury Actions. A new trial may be granted to all or any of the parties and on all or a part of the issues. To preserve for appeal a challenge to the sufficiency of a trial court’s findings in the final judgment, a party must raise that issue in a motion for rehearing under this rule. On a motion for a rehearing of matters heard without a jury, including summary judgments, the court may open the judgment if one has been entered, take additional testimony, and enter a new judgment.

(b) – (g) [NO CHANGE]

Committee Notes [NO CHANGE] Court Commentary 1984 Amendment. [NO CHANGE] 2022 Amendments. The amendment to subdivision (a) does not address or affect, by negative implication, any other instance in which a motion for rehearing is or might be necessary to preserve an issue for appellate review.

-4-FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE

RULE 12.530. MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL AND REHEARING; AMENDMENTS OF JUDGMENTS

(a) Jury and Non-Jury Actions. A new trial or rehearing may be granted to all or any of the parties and on all or a part of the issues. To preserve for appeal a challenge to the sufficiency of a trial court’s findings in the final judgment, a party must raise that issue in a motion for rehearing under this rule. On a motion for a rehearing of matters heard without a jury, including summary judgments, the court may open the judgment if one has been entered, take additional testimony, and enter a new judgment.

(b) – (h) [NO CHANGE]

Court Commentary

2022 Amendments. The amendment to subdivision (a) does not address or affect, by negative implication, any other instance in which a motion for rehearing is or might be necessary to preserve an issue for appellate review.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Rojas v. Londono (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)
    …he parties consummated the marriage and the Wife did not enter the marriage to commit fraud, we find the trial court properly denied the Husband’s petition for annulment of marriage. See In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.530, 346 So. 3d 1161, 1162 (Fla. 2022) (“To preserve for appeal a challenge to the sufficiency of a trial court’s findings in the final judgment, a party must raise that issue in a motion for rehearing under this rule.”); Sack v. Sack, 184 So. 2d 434, 436 (Fla. 3d DC…
  • Mishelle Addys Perdomo Vindel v. Stewart, 388 So. 3d 228 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw