IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULE OF PROCEDURE 12.340, AND FORMS 12.930(B) AND 12.930(C)
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court adopted an amendment to Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.340 to exclude expert interrogatories authorized by rule 12.280 from the ten-interrogatory limit, but declined to amend the associated forms to add a broad standard interrogatory requesting names and addresses of persons with knowledge of issues in the proceeding.
The Court adopted the amendment to rule 12.340 excluding expert interrogatories from the ten-interrogatory limit, but declined to adopt the proposed amendments to forms 12.930(b) and (c) that would have added a broad standard interrogatory requesting information about all persons with knowledge of issues in the proceeding.
[1] Expert interrogatories authorized by rule 12.280 are not included within the limitation of ten additional interrogatories to a party prescribed by rule 12.340.
[2] A court may decline to amend standard family law interrogatory forms if a proposed addition is deemed too expansive.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The expert interrogatories authorized by rule 12.280 are not included within the limitation of ten additional interrogatories to a party prescribed by this rule.”
The core amendment adopted by the Court, clarifying that expert interrogatories are excluded from the ten-interrogatory limit in rule 12.340(b).
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Florida Bar's Family Law Rules Committee proposed amendments to rule 12.340 and forms 12.930(b) and (c). The Committee approved the rule amendment…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
The Florida Bar’s Family Law Rules Committee (Committee) proposes amending Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.340 (Interrogatories to Parties) and Forms 12.930(b) (Standard Family Law Interrogatories for Original or Enforcement Proceedings) and 12.930(c) (Standard Family Law Interrogatories for Modification Proceedings). See Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 12.140(b)(1).
We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const. The Committee approved the proposed amendments to rule 12.340 by a vote of 16-2-1 and to forms 12.930(b) and (c) by a vote of 9-8-2. The Florida Bar Board of Governors unanimously recommends adopting the amendments. After the Committee filed the proposed amendments with the Court, the Court published the proposal for comment. One comment in support of the amendments was received.
We adopt the amendment to rule 12.340 as proposed by the Committee. In subdivision (b) (Additional Interrogatories), we add the language, “The expert interrogatories authorized by rule 12.280 are not included within the limitation of ten additional interrogatories to a party prescribed by this rule.” Effectively, this excludes interrogatories authorized by rule 12.280 from the ten interrogatory limit imposed by rule 12.340.
However, we decline to amend forms 12.930 (b) and (c) as proposed by the Committee. We agree with the Committee’s minority that the proposal to add a standard interrogatory to each form that requests the names and addresses of all persons who are believed to have any knowledge concerning any of the issues in the proceeding and to specify the subject matter about which the person has knowledge is too expansive.
Accordingly, the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure are amended as reflected in the appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated by underscoring. The amendments shall become effective immediately. -2-It is so ordered.
MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, COURIEL, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur. THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER