FRANK X. GLIOZZO, APPELLANT,
v.
LYNNE FORTE GLIOZZO, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Special Equity Claim cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Although the evidence does not support the husband’s claim that all of the sums paid towards the purchase of the entireties property in Seminole County came from his separate funds unconnected with the marital relationship, it does appear, without dispute, that the substantial down payment made by the husband came from a source unconnected with the marital relationship and that, therefore, the trial court erred in denying the husband’s claim for a special equity in this property. Accordingly, the judgment of dissolution is reversed in respect to the denial of the husband’s special equity in this property and affirmed in all other respects. The case is remanded to the trial court for a determination of the husband’s special equity in accordance with Landay v. Landay, 429 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1983).
Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wertkin v. Wertkin, 763 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)…day v. Landay, 400 So. 2d 43, 45 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), opinion modified on other grounds, 429 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1983)(spouse who contributes a down payment on the marital home with non-marital funds is entitled to a special equity); Gliozzo v. Gliozzo, 503 So. 2d 967, 967 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)(same). The failure of the court to make specific findings as to each party’s special equity is reversible error. See Scott v. Scott, 643 So. 2d 1124, 1126 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Nash v. Nash, 624 So. 2d 370, 371 (Fla. 3d DCA 19…
-
Nabil Ghali, M.D. v. Smith, 575 So. 2d 1386 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…uarez has no standing in the trial court or in this appeal. We further find that Ghali also lacks the requisite standing to appeal the denial of a nonparty’s motion to quash substitute service of process. See, e.g., Kaufman v. Metro Limo Fund, Inc., 503 So. 2d 967 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Accordingly, we affirm.…
-
Super Serv., Inc. v. Wilhelm Larsen and Curtis Lee George, Jr., 791 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)…rt’s order. Super Service has no standing to assert either defense as both are personal to defendant George. See Meadows of Citrus County, Inc. v. Jones, 704 So. 2d 202, 203 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)(as to Rule 1.070(j)); Kaufman v. Metro Limo Fund, Inc., 503 So. 2d 967 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Because appellant has no standing to raise the is [*1119] sue, we express no opinion on the validity of service. Affirmed. WARNER, C.J., STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Sumner Landay v. Landay, 429 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1983)