TO LUU, APPELLANT,
v.
WING TAT MUI AND SHUK WING MUI, APPELLEES
TO LUU, APPELLANT,
WING TAT MUI AND SHUK WING MUI, APPELLEES
502 So. 2d 1359
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1987)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment in a contract case. Appellant complains he was not awarded sufficient pre-judgment interest and costs. The only record appellant has caused to be sent to us is the motion regarding interest and costs and some orders and judgments denying the same. There is no basis for the denials mentioned in the orders and we have no knowledge as to what occurred at trial or at the hearings which caused the judge to deny the costs and to award what appellant says is insufficient pre-judgment interest. Appellant has failed to demonstrate error. AFFIRMED.
COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
S.A.B.T.C. Townhouse Ass'n, Inc. v. Schmitz, 565 So. 2d 827 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)…ellate record of this five-day jury trial precludes us from finding that the trial court’s cost determination is not supported by the record so as to require reversal. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla.1979); Luu v. Mui, 502 So. 2d 1359 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). In regard to points (2) and (3), however, we must agree with the appellant. The record presented to us does reveal a written objection filed with the trial court prior to the final hearing on the basis that the defendants’ moti…