SARASOTA CLOTH FABRIC & FOAM, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
E.J. BENES, ETC., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Sarasota Cloth Fabric & Foam appeals a summary judgment dismissing its counterclaim for conversion against its landlord Benes. The court reverses, finding that genuine issues of material fact exist regarding whether merchandise left on the premises was abandoned trash or goods left for appraisal, precluding summary judgment.
Summary judgment was improper because genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether the merchandise was abandoned trash or left for appraisal, and these factual disputes could not be resolved on summary judgment.
[1] A genuine issue of material fact precludes summary judgment.
[2] An affidavit containing only legal conclusions is insufficient to negate the allegations of a counterclaim.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Whether the merchandise left behind was trash or treasure, or whether it was abandoned as claimed by the landlord or left for appraisal pursuant to an agreement between the parties was a factual dispute not capable of resolution by summary judgment.”
The core holding establishing that the disputed characterization of the merchandise precluded summary judgment and required trial.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceSarasota, as tenant, vacated the leased premises and left certain goods and merchandise behind. Benes' employee Paul Barrie entered the premises and d…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Abandonment Of Property cases and more on FLexlaw
ORFINGER, Judge.
Sarasota Cloth Fabric & Foam, Inc. (Sarasota) appeals from a summary final judgment entered against it on its counterclaim for conversion.1 Because we find that a genuine issue of material fact exists, we reverse for trial.
The main action is by Benes, as landlord, against Sarasota, as tenant, for damages resulting from an alleged breach of the lease between the parties. The pertinent count of the counterclaim alleged that the landlord, through its authorized agent, converted certain goods and merchandise belonging to the tenant and sought damages for that conversion. The landlord’s answer denied the claim.
Upon remand following the first appeal, the landlord filed a motion for summary judgment, supporting it with his own affidavit and with the affidavit of Paul Barrie, his employee. Benes’ affidavit contains only legal conclusions which do not suffice to negate the allegations of the counterclaim. Barrie’s affidavit states that after Sarasota vacated the premises and turned over the keys to him, he entered the premises to clean it, and disposed of a bunch of “trash” which had been left behind by Sarasota. In response, the tenant filed the affidavit of its president, John Bass, in which he asserted, among other things, that pursuant to an agreement with Benes, certain goods and merchandise belonging to Sarasota were left behind for inspection by the landlord for the purpose of determining the extent of water damage to that merchandise during the lease term.
Whether the merchandise left behind was trash or treasure, or whether it was abandoned as claimed by the landlord or left for appraisal pursuant to an agreement between the parties was a factual dispute not capable of resolution by summary judgment.
REVERSED.
COBB and COWART, JJ., concur. . In a previous appeal, this court held that the count in appellant’s counterclaim which alleged a conversion of its goods by appellee was permissive, and that an order finally dismissing that count for failure to state a cause of action was appealable as a separate and distinct claim not interdependent with the other pleaded claims. Sarasota Cloth Fabric & Foam, Inc. v. Benes, 482 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). For these same reasons, the final summary judgment as to that count is appealable as well.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
A.W. Cunningham v. Mbna Am. Bank, N.A., 8 So. 3d 438 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)…a permissive counterclaim is a final order subject to appeal, provided the order otherwise meets the test of finality. See Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 22.4, at 450 (2009 ed.) (citing Sarasota Cloth Fabric & Foam, Inc. v. Benes, 502 So. 2d 1354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Campbell v. Gordon, 674 So. 2d 783 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)); see also Yunger v. Oliver, 803 So. 2d 884, 888 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (affirming order on appeal and holding that two permissive counterclaims were properly stricken by the t…
Authorities Cited
- B & M Trucking Co., Inc. v. Malone, 482 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
- Sarasota Cloth Fabric & Foam, Inc. v. E.J. Benes, 482 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986)