ERWIN SUSSMAN AND IRA GUILDEN, DECEASED, BY AND THROUGH PAUL GUILDEN, HIS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BANK OF ISRAEL, MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL, BANK HAPOALIM, LTD., MOSES MANDELBAUM, GALIA MAOR, ZEEV EVELES, AND JOHN DOES 1-5, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of the suit on the grounds of forum non conveniens, finding no abuse of discretion.
Plaintiffs, founders, shareholders, and directors of a liquidated Israeli bank, sued for fraud. The district court dismissed the suit on forum non con…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Forum Non Conveniens cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from the September 16, 1992, order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Charles S. Haight, Jr., Judge) dismissing on grounds of forum non conveniens a suit arising out of the activities of an Israeli bank, the North American Bank. The Bank was liquidated by Israeli authorities in 1988. The suit is brought by Erwin Sussman and Ira Guilden, who is deceased and is suing by his personal representative. Sussman and Guilden were founders, shareholders, and directors of the Bank. They claim to have been defrauded of several millions of dollars that they invested in the Bank. Suss-man is a Swiss citizen residing in California; Guilden was a United States citizen, resident in New York.
In a comprehensive opinion, Judge Haight dismissed the suit on grounds of forum non conveniens. Sussman v. Bank of Israel, 801 F.Supp. 1068 (S.D.N.Y.1992). He conditioned the dismissal on the defendants’ agreeing to waive any Israeli limitations defenses that would not have been available when the complaint was filed in the United States. He also required an undertaking from appropriate Israeli officials that Sussman would not be detained in Israel in connection with a suit by the Bank’s liquidator, now pending in Israel, if Sussman traveled there to initiate his own lawsuit against the .Bank. Upon compliance with these conditions, the United States suit was finally dismissed.
We review the dismissal ruling under an abuse of discretion standard. See Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno, 454 U.S. 235, 257, 102 S.Ct. 252, 266, 70 L.Ed.2d 419 (1981); Borden, Inc. v. Meiji Milk Products Co., 919 F. 2d 822, 827 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2259, 114 L.Ed.2d 712 (1991). We need not consider the significance of Sussman’s Swiss citizenship or California residence since Judge Haight assessed the dismissal motion on the assumption that both plaintiffs were “entitled to array themselves in the full panoply of a home state litigant.” 801 F.Supp. at 1073. Judge Haight concluded, applying traditional standards, that this suit was a “quintessential case for application of the forum non conveniens doctrine.” Id. at 1079. After considering all of appellants’ contentions,, we are satisfied that the District Judge acted well within his discre-' tion.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Otto Candies, LLC v. Citigroup, Inc., 963 F.3d 1331 (11th Cir. 2020)…hat the "alleged torts all occurred in Mexico." 508 F.3d at 795, 802. This is an important distinction, and one that appears in other international commerce cases. For example, in Sussman v. Bank of Israel, 801 F. Supp. 1068 (S.D.N.Y. 1992), aff'd, 990 F.2d 71 (2d Cir. 1993), the district court explained that "[w]here an American plaintiff chooses to invest in a foreign country and then complains of fraudulent acts occurring primarily in that country, the plaintiff's ability to rely upon citizenship as a…
-
Blanco v. Banco Indus. de Venezuela, S.A., 997 F.2d 974 (2d Cir. 1993)
-
Warter v. Boston Sec., S.A., 380 F. Supp. 2d 1299 (S.D. Fla. 2004)…ulent acts occurring primarily in that country, the plaintiffs ability to rely upon citizenship as a talisman against forum non conveniens dismissal is diminished.” Sussman v. Bank of Israel, 801 F.Supp. 1068, 1073 (S.D.N.Y.1992), aff'd, 990 F.2d 71, 71-72 (2d Cir.1993). Dr. Warter, the only U.S. citizen Plaintiff, is already involved in legal proceedings in Argentina. Although resolution of the Argentine criminal prosecution will not dispose of the issues presented in this civil suit, the issu…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno, 454 U.S. 235 (U.S. 1981)
- Borden, Inc. v. Meiji Milk Prods. Co., Ltd., 919 F.2d 822 (2d Cir. 1990)