BRAULIO J. VINOLY AND GLADYS VINOLY, APPELLANTS,
v.
HAROLD PETLUCK, INDIVIDUALLY, AND PROPERTY PROFESSIONALS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES
BRAULIO J. VINOLY AND GLADYS VINOLY, APPELLANTS,
HAROLD PETLUCK, INDIVIDUALLY, AND PROPERTY PROFESSIONALS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES
502 So. 2d 525
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1987)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Because Troton, Inc., an entity separate from appellants, acquired the subject property, Troton’s purchase did not affect appellants’ agreement to pay appellees’ commission for the 1973 sale of the property. We therefore affirm the trial court’s Amended Final Judgment. See Ed Skoda Ford, Inc. v. P & P Paint & Body Shop, Inc., 277 So. 2d 818 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 284 So. 2d 395 (Fla.1973); Mease v. Warm Mineral Springs, Inc., 128 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 132 So. 2d 291 (Fla.1961); Marks v. Green, 122 So. 2d 491 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Mease v. Warm Mineral Springs, Inc., 128 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961)
- ED Skoda Ford, Inc. v. P & P Paint & Body Shop, Inc., 277 So. 2d 818 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)
- P & P Paint & Body Shop, Inc. v. ED Skoda Ford, Inc., 284 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 1973)
- Marks v. Green, 122 So. 2d 491 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960)
- Double Prot. Awning Co v. Prieto, 132 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 1961)
- Inter-American Pipeline Corp. v. Baldwin, 132 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 1961)