UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
OSCAR J. PEREZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

10th Cir. | 1992-08-24
No. 90-4149
Before McKAY, Chief Judge, LOGAN, SEYMOUR, MOORE, ANDERSON, TACHA, BALDOCK, BRORBY, EBEL, KELLY, Circuit Judges and SPARR, District Judge.
975 F.2d 677 United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases

Opinion of the Court

Upon consideration of the government’s petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc and the appellant’s response:

The petition for rehearing is denied by the panel that rendered the decision sought to be reheard.

In accordance with Fed.R.App.P. 35(b), the clerk transmitted the suggestion for rehearing en banc to members of the panel and to all other judges of the court in regular active service. A vote was taken and pursuant thereto the court grants rehearing en banc of those issues raised in the government’s petition.

Oral argument on rehearing en banc is set for Tuesday, September 29, at 2:30 p.m. in the United States Courthouse, Denver, Colorado.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw