DIANE D. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1987-01-29
No. 86-1083
UPCHURCH, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.
501 So. 2d 191 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1987) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
COBB, Judge.

COBB, Judge.

The appellant, Diane D. Williams, was convicted of second-degree grand theft and sentenced to ten years in prison, exceeding her guidelines sentence and double the statutory maximum, based upon a finding that she was an habitual offender. The trial court listed the following reasons for departure:

1. The habitual offender determination.

2. Necessity for protection of the public, citing Brady v. State, 457 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

3. Eight municipal code convictions that were not scored, and for which there were no analogous criminal statutes.

None of these reasons supports a departure sentence. The first reason has recently been invalidated by Whitehead v. State, 498 So. 2d 863, 11 FLW 553 (Fla.1986). Insofar as “protection of the public” is merely a reference to prior record, it cannot be used as a basis for departure under Hendrix v. State, 475 So. 2d 1218 (Fla.1985). Finally, we do not believe that municipal code violations, which are not considered serious enough to be scored under prior record, can serve as a clear and convincing reason for departure.

REVERSED and REMANDED for sentencing in accordance with the guidelines.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Laydani Martinez v. State, 557 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
    …scoresheet resulting in the most severe sentencing range and sentenced appellant to 22 years in prison. See Spann v. State, 14 F.L.W. 2486, 550 So. 2d 164 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); State v. Davis, 537 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); and Williams v. State, 501 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). On appeal, appellant complains that use of the Category 9 scoresheet to sentence him denied him equal protection of the law. Appellant argues that there is no distinction between escape and possessing contraband which justifie…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw