AEROSERV INTERNATIONAL, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, AIR CARRIER ENGINE SERVICES, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, AEROTHRUST CORPORATION, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, AND WAYNE K. GOETTSCHE, PETITIONERS,
v.
BEJ ENTERPRISES, INC., NATIONAL AIRCRAFT SERVICES, INC., AND JAMES E. BREWER, RESPONDENTS
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted in part. The order granting the respondents’ Motion to Compel Arthur Young & Company to Appear at Deposition Duces Tecum, to which the instant petition for certiorari is directed, is modified so as to limit the production required to only those records that pertain to the jet engines and related material, the ownership of which is at issue in this case.
DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ., concur.
BASKIN, Judge
(dissenting).
Because, in my view, petitioners waived the accountant-client privilege in regard to some, and therefore all, communications on the subject, I decline to limit production of the requested records. See Weil v. Investment/Indicators, Research & Management, Inc., 647 F. 2d 18 (9th Cir.1981); Smith v. Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co., 538 F.Supp. 977 (D.Del.1982), aff'd, 758 F. 2d 668 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1066, 105 S.Ct. 2142, 85 L.Ed.2d 499 (1985); § 90.507, Fla.Stat. (1985).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Higgs v. State, 533 So. 2d 933 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See State v. Castillo, 486 So. 2d 565 (Fla.1986); Garcia v. State, 501 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Rose v. State, 492 So. 2d 1353 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Compare Foster v. State, 464 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).…
-
Garcia v. State, 559 So. 2d 655 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…6 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); McCuiston v. State, 534 So. 2d 1144 (Fla.1988); Stano v. State, 520 So. 2d 278 (Fla.1988); Lightbourne v. State, 471 So. 2d 27 (Fla.1985); Goode v. State, 403 So. 2d 931 (Fla.1981); Garcia v. State, 501 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).…
-
Nerey v. State, 585 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…sted the unscored capital felony of first degree murder as the reason for departure. This does not appear to be erroneous. See Lawton v. State, 538 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989; Fryson v. State, 506 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Garcia v. State, 501 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Smith v. State, 454 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984. The appellant contends the trial court erred in failing to give the jury his requested special instruction on his defense of withdrawal where there was sufficient evidence to supp…
Authorities Cited
- Weil v. Investment/Indicators, 647 F.2d 18 (9th Cir. 1981)
- Jensen v. Gates Learjet Corp., 471 U.S. 1066 (U.S. 1985)
- Pudlo v. City of Chicago, 471 U.S. 1066 (U.S. 1985)