UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,

v.

DANIEL PROA-TOVAR, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

9th Cir. | 1992-05-13

No. 90-50373

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

966 F.2d 1277 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1992) Positive Treatment

Cited by 5 cases

Opinion of the Court

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

United States v. Feeney, 984 F.2d 1053 (9th Cir. 1993)
United States v. Garcia, 997 F.2d 1273 (9th Cir. 1993)
United States v. Wayde Lynn Kurt, 986 F.2d 309 (9th Cir. 1993)

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. DANIEL PROA-TOVAR, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,

v.

DANIEL PROA-TOVAR, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT