ROOSEVELT HOLLAND III, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROOSEVELT HOLLAND III, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
500 So. 2d 223
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1986)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant’s convictions but reverse his sentence for burglary and remand with directions that appellant be resen-tenced on the burglary conviction within the sentencing guidelines. See Hendrix v. State, 475 So. 2d 1218 (Fla.1985).
ANSTEAD, LETTS and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Samson Earl Riley v. State, 498 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)…We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to suppress evidence. We reverse that part of appellant’s judgment which required him to pay court costs, and remand for proceedings consistent with this court’s opinion in Craddock v. State, 500 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). RYDER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL, J., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Hendrix v. State, 475 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. 1985)