HANS H. WEHRLI, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JAMES PAGLIOTTI; CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES, HUGH R. MANES, ESQ., REAL-PARTY-IN-INTEREST-APPELLANT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse "Clearly Erroneous" Standard Of Review cases and more on FLexlaw
Upon reconsideration, a thorough examination of the record has disclosed an abundance of material that was not included in appellant’s brief. Unfortunately, appellees filed no opposition brief nor any other papers before this court to assist us in deciding this matter. After reviewing the record, particularly the transcripts, we conclude that the district judge exercised commendable restraint in dealing with counsel for both parties. The record establishes that counsel failed to provide the court with the assistance on jury instructions and special verdict forms that judges would normally expect from counsel.
We also conclude that the district court’s factual findings regarding the sanctions imposed were not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the opinion filed August 1, 1991 is vacated and ordered withdrawn from publication. The district court’s judgment imposing sanctions is
AFFIRMED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
United States v. Watts, 519 U.S. 148 (U.S. 1997)
-
United States v. Boney, 977 F.2d 624 (D.C. Cir. 1992)
-
United States v. Sherrod, 964 F.2d 1501 (5th Cir. 1992)
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence