WILLIE SMITH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
R.D. MCCLEOD, STEVE GILLIAN, K. BRIGHT, D. BOSTIC, W. MIXON, W. COGDELL, S. ETHRIDGE AND R. JAMISON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the inmate's § 1983 lawsuit was frivolous and imposed sanctions and restrictions on future filings.
An inmate filed a § 1983 lawsuit alleging unconstitutional treatment by prison officials, including denial of showers and detention in a strip cell. T…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sanctions For Frivolous Filings cases and more on FLexlaw
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:
Before us on a fifth appeal is Willie Smith, an inmate at the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, whose § 1983 lawsuit against numerous prison officials was dismissed as frivolous by the district court. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). In this complaint, Smith alleged that such actions by the prison officials as the occasional denial of showers, a seven-day detention in a “strip cell” because of an altercation with another prisoner, and discipline imposed for making suggestive remarks to a female nurse were unconstitutional. Smith also complains that the district court should not have sanctioned him $25.00 for filing this frivolous suit. Given Smith’s litigious history, we wonder only that the district court’s sanction was so small.
Time and again, we have warned prisoners that they may not abuse the court system by the filing of repetitive groundless lawsuits. We do so again. In another of Smith’s appeals, decided six months ago, he was warned that “the filing of any further frivolous appeals would bring into play the entire panoply of sanctions available to the court, including the imposition of financial penalties and the limiting of his access to the judicial system.” In that case, Smith had complained, inter alia, of experiencing a leaky cell one night because of a heavy rain. Smith v. Allison, 931 F. 2d 890 (5th Cir.1991) (unpublished).
Because of Smith’s unwillingness to confine his litigiousness to cases of merit, we hereby impose a $100.00 sanction, payable to the Office of the Attorney General of Texas, which filed a brief in this case. F.R.A.P. 38. We also order that Smith be barred from filing any further appeals in this court until (1) the sanctions awarded by this court and the district court are fully paid; and (2) a district court certifies his appeal as having some arguable merit. See Vinson v. Texas Board of Corrections, 901 F. 2d 474, 475 (5th Cir.1990).
Appeal DISMISSED as frivolous; sanctions imposed.