SHAFFEY BASHURE, APPELLANT,
v.
ESTATE OF EMILY B. PAULK, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1986-11-18
No. BJ-447
JOANOS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
498 So. 2d 525 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1986) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

In a probate matter, the Florida First District Court of Appeal reversed an award of attorney's fees and costs to Olga Davis after her successful motion to strike a portion of Shaffey Bashure's petition for revocation of probate. The court held that an award of attorney's fees under section 57.105 is premature when the underlying motion to strike does not represent a final disposition of the entire action.


Holding

An award of attorney's fees under section 57.105 is premature and improper when the prevailing party has only succeeded on a motion to strike that leaves the remainder of the petition viable and pending, because the court cannot find a complete absence of justiciable issues when the entire controversy has not been resolved.


Headnotes

[1] An award of attorney's fees under § 57.105 Fla.Stat. …

[2] A petition for revocation of probate renders the proceeding an adversary proceeding governed by the rules of civil procedure.

Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“the proceedings, as nearly as practicable, shall be conducted similar to suits of a civil nature and the rules of civil procedure shall govern.”

Establishes that adversary probate proceedings are governed by civil procedure rules

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Emily B. Paulk died on April 4, 1984. Shaffey Bashure, the decedent's brother and heir at law, filed a petition for revocation of probate seeking to s…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Judge.

THOMPSON, Judge.

Appellant is the brother and an heir at law of the decedent Emily B. Paulk, who died April 4, 1984. Appellant filed a petition to revoke probate which sought, inter alia, to set aside the inter vivos gift of two parcels of property which decedent made to Olga Davis. As an intervenor, Davis successfully moved to have this portion of appellant’s petition stricken. Davis then sought, and was. awarded, attorney’s fees and costs based on her prevailing on the motion to strike. It is this award of fees and costs which is the subject of this appeal. We agree with appellant that the award was in error, and reverse.

Appellant’s filing of a petition for revocation of probate renders the proceeding an “adversary proceeding” pursuant to Fla.R.P. & G.P. 5.025. As such, “the proceedings, as nearly as practicable, shall be conducted similar to suits of a civil nature and the rules of civil procedure shall govern.” Id. An order granting a motion to strike is not a final appealable order under Fla.R.App.P. 9.130. See Armstrong v. Armstrong, 401 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Kozusnik v. Selkowitz, 379 So. 2d 168 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Radio Communications Corp. v. OKI Electronics of America, Inc., 277 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).

The circuit court’s granting of Davis’ motion to strike left the remainder of appellant’s petition still viable and pending. The motion for attorney’s fees and costs, and the order granting it, indicate that the authority for the award is § 57.105 Fla.Stat. which provides that a prevailing party in any civil action shall be awarded a reasonable attorney’s fee if “the court finds that there was a complete absence of a justiciable issue of either law or fact raised by the losing party.” In the instant case, an award of attorney’s fees on this basis is premature. Although Davis was the prevailing party as to the motion to strike, she has not prevailed as to the entire action. Steinhardt v. Eastern Shores White House Assoc. Inc., 413 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

In addition, there cannot have been a determination that there is a complete absence of any justiciable issue of law or fact in this case because the petition for revocation of probate has not been disposed of, and all aspects of the controversy have not yet been resolved. We also note that it is inherently contradictory to subject appellant to a final order awarding attorney’s fees on the basis of an order granting a motion to strike which appellant is precluded from appealing. At this point in the proceedings, no award of attorney’s fees is authorized. Whitten v. Progressive Casualty Ins. Co., 410 So. 2d 501 (Fla.1982); Rivera v. Deauville Hotel Employers Service Corp., 277 So. 2d 265 (Fla.1973).

The award of attorney’s fees is premature and, accordingly, is REVERSED.

JOANOS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Khoury v. Est. OF Rose K. Kashey, 533 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
    …client’s endorsement of the disclosure and the continuing representation. Ward, 472 So. 2d at 1162. The order under review is affirmed. . Florida courts have previously applied section 57.105 to probate proceedings. See Bashure v. Estate of Paulk, 498 So. 2d 525 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Anderson v. Anderson, 468 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 476 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 1985); Goldwom v. Estate of Day, 452 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Ferguson v. Estate of Ferguson, 410 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Allen…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw