S.J. & W. RANCH, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

DEXTER LEHTINEN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• Parts Depot Co., L.P. v. Fla. Auto Supply, Inc., 669 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
  …re not intended to support artificially firms that cannot effectively compete on their own. It is only when the market is being distorted by anti-competitive conduct that the antitrust laws should be invoked.” Seagood Trading Corp. v. Jerrico, Inc., 924 F. 2d 1555, 1573 (11th Cir.1991). Here there was no proof that prices were higher as a result of Florida Auto Supply’s failure to compete in the market or that the supply was diminished. Thus, there was no evidence from which a jury could find harm to the mark…
• City OF Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chems., Inc., 158 F.3d 548 (11th Cir. 1998)
  …. To prove that such an agreement exists between two or more persons, a plaintiff must demonstrate ‘a unity of purpose or a common design and understanding, or a meeting of minds in an unlawful arrangement.’ ” Seagood Trading Corp. v. Jerrico, Inc., 924 F. 2d 1555, 1573 (11th Cir.1991) (quoting American Tobacco Co. v. United States, 328 U.S. 781, 810, 66 S.Ct. 1125, 1139, 90 L.Ed. 1575 (1946)). “We recognize that it is only in rare cases that a plaintiff can establish the existence of a conspiracy by showing…
• ROE v. Aware Woman Ctr. FOR Choice, Inc., 253 F.3d 678 (11th Cir. 2001)
  …ough data must be pleaded so that each element of the alleged ... violation can be properly iden-tiffed”); Municipal Utils. Bd. of Albertville v. Alabama Power Co., 934 F. 2d 1493, 1501 (11th Cir.1991) (same); Seagood Trading Corp. v. Jerrico, Inc., 924 F. 2d 1555, 1576 (11th Cir.1991) (same); Gooley v. Mobil Oil Corp., 851 F. 2d 513, 515 (1st Cir.1988) (stating that even under the liberal notice pleading standard, a plaintiff is still required to “set forth factual allegations, either direct or inferential,…

Authorities Cited

• S.J. & W. Ranch, Inc. v. Lehtinen, 913 F.2d 1538 (11th Cir. 1990)