SHALOM MANOR, INC., D/B/A SHALOM MANOR RETIREMENT HOME AND KING DAVID RETIREMENT HOME, APPELLANTS,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, APPELLEE
SHALOM MANOR, INC., D/B/A SHALOM MANOR RETIREMENT HOME AND KING DAVID RETIREMENT HOME, APPELLANTS,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, APPELLEE
497 So. 2d 740
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1986)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We are satisfied from the record that HRS Form 1806 incorporates all of the elements required by statute and by Rule 10A-5.27(l)(c) for written notice of deficiencies. We also conclude that service of Form 1806 upon the administrator of the two adult congregate living facilities sufficed as proper notice to the licensee of the HRS violations. Therefore we affirm the final agency order. We note that this dispute could have been avoided by the agency sending notice to the licensee’s address as well as to the administrator of the facility.
AFFIRMED.
HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Earnest Mathis, Jr. v. Fla. Dep't OF Corr., 726 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)…eedings in a timely fashion. Cf. Lamar Adver. Co. v. Department of Transp., 523 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Woodard v. Florida State Univ., 518 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Shalom Manor, Inc. v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Servs., 497 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Xerox Corp. v. Florida Dep’t of Prof'l Regulation, 489 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). The petition PERC denied did not seek to initiate a new proceeding.6 Mr. Mathis’s petition sought resolution of an as yet unresolved issue…
-
DAY v. High Point Condo. Resorts, Ltd., 521 So. 2d 1064 (Fla. 1988)…the year in which the property was last assessed in order to fall within the language in section 197.502(4)(f) applies to both time-share fee owners and other owners of real property alike. Id. at 1305-06. Accord Driftwood Management Co. v. Nolte, 497 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Oyster Pointe Resort Condominium Ass’n v. Nolte, 497 So. 2d 1306 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). We reject the argument that the timeshare owners have been denied due process by this statutory scheme, particularly the utilization of the m…
-
Oyster Pointe Resort Condo. Assoc., Inc. v. Nolte, 524 So. 2d 415 (Fla. 1988)…[*416] KOGAN, Justice. This consolidated appeal is from decisions of the Fourth District Court of Appeal, 497 So. 2d 740 and 1306 (1986), declaring section 192.037, Florida Statutes (1983), valid upon the authority of Spanish River Resort Corp. v. Walker, 497 So. 2d 1299 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. The properties in this…