WILLIE JASPER DARDEN, JR., PETITIONER,
v.
LOUIE WAINWRIGHT, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, AND RICHARD DUGGER, SUPERINTENDENT, FLORIDA STATE PRISON, RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a claim of racial bias in the application of the death penalty cannot be raised for the first time in a habeas corpus proceeding but must be presented in a motion for post-conviction relief.
Willie Jasper Darden, a state prisoner under sentence of death, petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus and a stay of execution. He alleged that the de…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Stay Of Execution cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Willie Jasper Darden, a state prisoner under sentence of death for whom a fifth death warrant has been signed, petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus and requests a stay of execution. We have jurisdiction, article V, section 3(b)(9), Florida Constitution, and deny the requested relief.
In this petition Darden alleges that the death penalty in Florida is applied on the basis of race and other impermissible factors. Because the United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari to review this issue in McCleskey v. Kemp, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 331, 80 L.Ed.2d 314 (1986), and Hitchcock v. Wainwright, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 2888, 90 L.Ed.2d 976 (1986), Darden claims that we should reconsider our previous rulings on this issue or, at least, grant a stay of execution pending resolution of McCleskey and Hitchcock.
We have held that this claim should be presented in a motion for post-conviction relief and cannot be raised for the first time in a habeas corpus proceeding. Stewart v. Wainwright, 494 So. 2d 489 (Fla.1986). Therefore, Darden is procedurally barred from raising this issue in this petition.
Accordingly, Darden’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus and request for a stay of execution are denied. The motion for stay of execution and/or for stay of execution pending filing and disposition of petition for writ of certiorari, and for other relief is denied also.
It is so ordered.
McDonald, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, EHRLICH and BARKETT, JJ., concur. SHAW, J., concurs in result only.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Darden v. State, 521 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 1988)…tate, 475 So. 2d 214 (Fla.1985). The denial of a second 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief was affirmed by this Court in Darden v. State, 475 So. 2d 217 (Fla.1985). A second petition for writ of habeas corpus was denied in Darden v. Wainwright, 495 So. 2d 179 (Fla.1986). In Darden v. State, 496 So. 2d 136 (Fla.1986), this Court affirmed the denial of Darden’s third 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. Darden raises two claims in his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Citing a litany of decisions in…
Authorities Cited
- Stewart v. Louie L. Wainwright, 494 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 1986)