THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
STANLEY L. SELIGMAN, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the referee's report and disbarred the respondent for three years.
The Florida Bar filed a complaint against Seligman for alleged misconduct. Seligman entered a conditional guilty plea, acknowledging violations of dis…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Violation Of Rules Of Professional Conduct cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Upon a complaint by The Florida Bar this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Seligman’s alleged misconduct. Seligman tendered a conditional guilty plea for consent judgment,* acknowledging his violation of article XI, Rules 11.02(3)(a) and (b), and Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(1), (3), (4) and (6) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The referee recommended that Seligman be found guilty in accordance with his conditional plea and be disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Florida for a period of three (3) years.
Neither side contests the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Stanley L. Selig-man is disbarred from the practice of law for a period of three (3) years effective immediately.
Judgment for costs in the amount of $229.00 is hereby entered against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, Acting C.J., and BOYD, OVERTON, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur. *
We feel It unnecessary to publish the full text of the plea. The Court file is open for inspection.