RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES' ASSOCIATION, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF GALVESTON, TEXAS, ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE GALVESTON WHARVES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES' ASSOCIATION, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
CITY OF GALVESTON, TEXAS, ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE GALVESTON WHARVES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
898 F.2d 481
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1990)
Opinion of the Court
ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:
Because the pendency of the interlocutory appeal from the district court’s judgment denying the preliminary injunction did not divest the district court of jurisdiction to proceed with other aspects of the case,1 that court did not act improperly in considering the plaintiff’s petition for a permanent injunction. For the reasons given in Railway Labor Executives’ Association v. City of Galveston, 897 F. 2d 164 (5th Cir.1990), we affirm the district courts judgment denying that petition.
. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 62(c); Plaquemines Parish Comm'n Council v. United States, 416 F. 2d 952, 954 (5th Cir.1969); 11 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure § 2962, at 631-32 (1973).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Plaquemines Parish Comm'n Council v. United States by John Mitchell, 416 F.2d 952 (5th Cir. 1969)
- Ry. Labor Executives' Ass'n v. The City OF Galveston, 897 F.2d 164 (5th Cir. 1990)