RELIANCE INSURANCE CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
TED O. ROMINE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
RELIANCE INSURANCE CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
TED O. ROMINE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
888 F.2d 1344
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
We affirm on the basis of the district court’s opinion in Reliance Insurance Co. v. Romine, 707 F.Supp. 550 (S.D.Ga.1989).
AFFIRMED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Fid. Cap. Corp., 920 F.2d 827 (11th Cir. 1991)…TJOFLAT, Chief Judge: In our earlier decision in this matter, United States v. Fidelity Capital Corp., 888 F. 2d 1344 (11th Cir.1989) (Fidelity I), we remanded the case to the district court to determine whether Fidelity Capital Corporation (Fidelity), a company licensed as a Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) under the provisions of the Small Business Invest…
-
United States v. Fid. Cap. Corp., 933 F.2d 949 (11th Cir. 1991)…conclusion that a company is the alter ego of its owner without requiring the district court to base that conclusion on specific findings of fact — we need not have remanded the case to the district court in United States v. Fidelity Capital Corp., 888 F. 2d 1344 (11th Cir.1989) (Fidelity I). Second, we find that it is unnecessary to remand the case for the district court to consider Commonwealth’s alternative theories for relief, as that court implicitly considered and rejected each alternative theory befo…