S.H. AND P.F., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
JOE EDWARDS AND R. DERRIL GAY, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES

11th Cir. | 1989-07-31
No. 87-8635
Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON and COX, Circuit Judges.
880 F.2d 1203 Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1989)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

On January 9,1989, an order issued from this court denying rehearing en banc in this case. See S.H. v. Edwards, 866 F. 2d 1420 (11th Cir.1989). On June 19, 1989, the Supreme Court denied certiorari. See S.H. v. Edwards, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 3187, 105 L.Ed.2d 696 (1989). A member of this court having requested before January 9, 1989 a poll on the application for rehearing en banc in this case, and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of such rehearing, we conclude that our order of January 9,1989 was improvidently issued. Accordingly, we vacate that order and instead direct that the above-styled cause shall be reheard by this court en banc with oral argument during the week of September 25, 1989, on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The panel opinion in this case, S.H. v. Edwards, 860 F. 2d 1045 (11th Cir.1988), is accordingly vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw