PHYLLIS J. SKEENS, APPELLANT,

v.

OHIO MEDICAL PRODUCTS AND LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Polley v. Polley, 588 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
  …s valuation of the PPC stock. The trial court’s valuation of the PPC stock must be supported by competent substantial evidence. Eckroade v. Eckroade, 570 So. 2d 1347 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Ross v. Bandi, 566 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Hamm v. Hamm, 492 So. 2d 467 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Marcoux v. Marcoux, 475 So. 2d 972 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), review denied, 486 So. 2d 597 (Fla.1986); Greer v. Greer, 438 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Hair v. Hair, 402 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), review denied, 412 So. 2d 46…
• Manuel v. Manuel, 498 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
  …arriage. Therefore, although the court stated that the wife had contributed no “extraordinary services,” it found that she was entitled to an equitable share of properties purchased by the husband and titled in his name alone. See also Hamm v. Hamm, 492 So. 2d 467 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Since the evidence in this case indicates not only that appellee contributed to the acquisition of the stock by working inside the home as a wife and mother of four during the marriage, but also that she worked [*1371] outside o…
• Reyher v. Reyher, 495 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)
  …cases dealt with real property owned as tenants by the en-tireties. The analysis in the equitable distribution of pension plans begins with 100% ownership (i.e., beneficial interest) by one party. (This is more than mere “title” as in Hamm v. Hamm, 492 So. 2d 467 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Absent any proof of premarital contributions to the plan, the trial court can treat the whole amount as a marital asset. Diffenderfer. In order to exclude any premarital contributions, the “owner” must prove the value of the pre…