THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
VON ENGINEERING COMPANY, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 5th DCA | 1986-07-17
No. 85-1369
UPCHURCH, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur., SHARP, J., dissents with opinion.
492 So. 2d 425 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1986) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.

SHARP, J., dissents with opinion.

Dissent
SHARP, J.,

SHARP, J.,

dissenting.

Whether or not appellants should be able to raise the defense of the one year statute of limitations1 in this case presents questions of fact not properly determined, in my view, by summary judgment. Therefore, I dissent.

. § 255.05(2), Fla.Stat. (1981).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Lorie v. Boston Invs. Grp., Inc., 847 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See La Rosa v. Fortier, 492 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Perimeter Invs., Inc. v. Amerifirst Dev., Co., 423 So. 2d 586 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw