BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, AND COASTAL PETROLEUM COMPANY, PETITIONERS,

v.

AGRICO CHEMICAL COMPANY, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Thompson v. State, 759 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 2000)
  …ssues before the judge. Because an adverse ruling is not a legally sufficient ground to disqualify the trial judge, there was no error in denying the motion to disqualify as not legally sufficient. See Barwick, 660 So. 2d at 692; Dragovich v. State, 492 So. 2d 350, 352 (Fla.1986). C. Inadequate Record on Direct Appeal In his fourth postconviction claim and his first and second habeas claims, Thompson contends that this Court was not provided with an adequate record during the direct appeal because some pret…
• Rutherford v. State, 727 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 1998)
  …as marginally relevant to rebut Rutherford’s testimony in the guilt phase that the victim was like a mother to him, that he had no reason to give her, a rough time, and that he was raised to have respect for the elderly. But cf. Dragovich v. State, 492 So. 2d 350, 355 (Fla.1986) (hearsay reputation evidence that the defendant was an arsonist known as “The Torch” was inadmissible under section 921.141(1) because the testimony was “not susceptible to the fair rebuttal contemplated by the statute”). More impor…
• Barwick v. State, 660 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 1995)
  …ause we agree that the motion was not legally sufficient. A motion is legally sufficient if it shows that the party making the motion has a well-grounded fear that he or she will not receive a fair trial from the presiding judge. Dragovich v. State, 492 So. 2d 350, 352 (Fla.1986); Tafero v. State, 403 So. 2d 355, 361 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 983, 102 S.Ct. 1492, 71 L.Ed.2d 694 (1982); State ex rel. Brown v. Dewell, 131 Fla. 566, 573, 179 So. 695, 697 (1938). In his brief, Barwick summarized the alle…

Authorities Cited

• Coastal Petroleum Co. v. Am. Cyanamid Co., 492 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 1986)
• The Bd. OF Trs. OF the Internal Improvement Tr. Fund of the State of Fla. v. Agrico Chem. Co., 462 So. 2d 829 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)