UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
JAMES NEAVILL, APPELLANT
Appellee’s petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc has been considered by the Court and is hereby granted. The Court’s opinion of March 1, 1989, 868 F. 2d 1000 (1989), is vacated. The Clerk of this Court is directed to set the case for en banc argument during the September 1989 session of court. The parties may file supplemental pleadings limited to not more than fifteen (15) pages and any arguments contained therein shall not duplicate any of the previously advanced arguments.
The motion to appoint new counsel and the motion for release pending appeal have also been considered by the Court and both motions are denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Frank, 956 F.2d 872 (9th Cir. 1991)
-
United States v. Blume, 967 F.2d 45 (2d Cir. 1992)
-
United States v. Manning, 923 F.2d 83 (8th Cir. 1991)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- United States v. Neavill, 868 F.2d 1000 (8th Cir. 1989)