JOSE GUBIENSIO-ORTIZ, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
AL KANAHELE, WARDEN, METROPOLITAN CORRECTIONAL CENTER SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. RAUL CHAVEZ-SANCHEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
JOSE GUBIENSIO-ORTIZ, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
AL KANAHELE, WARDEN, METROPOLITAN CORRECTIONAL CENTER SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. RAUL CHAVEZ-SANCHEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
871 F.2d 104
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
On August 23, 1988, we held the Sentencing Guidelines, challenged in these cases, to be unconstitutional (Wiggins, dissenting). On January 23, 1989, the Supreme Court simultaneously granted a petition for writ of certiorari and vacated the judgment, remanding to this court for further consideration in light of Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 647, 102 L.Ed.2d 714 (1988). United States v. Chavez-Sanchez, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 859, 102 L.Ed.2d 984 (1989) vacating Gubiensio-Ortiz v. Kanahele, 857 F. 2d 1245 (1988). In Mistretta, the Supreme Court upheld the Sentencing Guidelines against the same Constitutional challenges that we considered in the instant case.
Upon reconsideration in light of Misiretta, we affirm Gubiensio-Ortiz v. United States, No. 88-5848. In United States v. Chavez-Sanchez, 88-5109, we reverse and remand for resentencing under the guidelines.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Ayarza, 874 F.2d 647 (9th Cir. 1989)
-
United States v. Ramos, 923 F.2d 1346 (9th Cir. 1991)
-
United States v. Wright, 891 F.2d 209 (9th Cir. 1989)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361 (U.S. 1989)
- Gubiensio-Ortiz v. Al Kanahele, 857 F.2d 1245 (9th Cir. 1988)