CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT AND CITY OF FARMERS BRANCH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
JOHNSON & CRAVENS, 13911, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN INSURANCE CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT AND CITY OF FARMERS BRANCH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
JOHNSON & CRAVENS, 13911, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN INSURANCE CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
867 F.2d 1517
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1989)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:
We grant the appellee’s motion to clarify our decision in this case, 858 F. 2d 1010 (5th Cir.1988), to the following extent. The sentence that reads:
In Bean v. Independent American Savings Association, [838 F. 2d 739 (5 Cir.1988)] this court acknowledged that the proviso in section 1730(k)(l) is an exception to the FSLIC’s otherwise exclusive jurisdiction to resolve claims against the FSLIC as receiver for a failed savings and loan association.1
is now modified to read:
In Bean v. Independent American Savings Association, this court acknowledged that the proviso in section 1730(k)(l) is an exception to the jurisdictional grant contained in that statute.
This court has no desire to enter a jurisdictional thicket that does not lie in the center of its path.
MOTION GRANTED.
. 858 F. 2d 1010, 1012 (footnote omitted).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carrollton-Farmers Branch Indep. Sch. Dist. & City of Farmers Branch v. Johnson & Cravens, 889 F.2d 571 (5th Cir. 1989)
Authorities Cited
- Bean v. Indep. Am. Sav. Ass'n, 838 F.2d 739 (5th Cir. 1988)
- Carrollton-Farmers Branch Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Johnson & Cravens, 858 F.2d 1010 (5th Cir. 1988)