MARTHA ROBINSON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
OTIS R. BOWEN, M.D., SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
MARTHA ROBINSON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
OTIS R. BOWEN, M.D., SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
867 F.2d 600
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (1989)
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We find that the trial court violated Rule 36.3 of the Rules of Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in relying upon an unpublished opinion, Van Natter v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, No. 79-1439, slip op. (10th Cir.1981). Notwithstanding this error, we affirm the trial court’s decision for the balance of reasons given in its opinion. 679 F.Supp. 1011 (D.Kan.1988). We cannot say that the court abused its discretion in finding that the Secretary’s position was not substantially justified for purposes of awarding attorney’s fees to the prevailing plaintiff under EAJA. AFFIRMED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Guglietti v. Sec'y OF Health & Human Servs., 900 F.2d 397 (1st Cir. 1990)
-
Perket v. Sec'y OF Health & Human Servs., 905 F.2d 129 (6th Cir. 1990)
-
Fruin-Colnon Corp. v. The United States, 912 F.2d 1426 (Fed. Cir. 1990)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence