THE BANK OF CORAL GABLES, A FLORIDA BANKING CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
RICHARD L. NEWBERG, AND TROSTER, SINGER, STEVENS, ROTHCHILD CORP., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Bank of Coral Gables appealed the dissolution of a garnishment writ against the employer of its judgment debtor, Richard Newberg. The court reversed, holding that when a judgment debtor files an affidavit claiming wages are exempt and the creditor timely denies the facts, the trial court must conduct a trial rather than dissolve the garnishment on the pleadings.
The trial court erred in failing to grant a trial on all issues. Under Florida Statute § 222.12, when a judgment debtor files an affidavit claiming attached funds are due for labor and services and that he is head of a family, and the party who sued out the process timely denies the facts alleged, the matter shall be tried by the court.
[1] A judgment debtor claiming an exemption for wages earned for personal services and labor as head of a family must timely deny facts set forth in the debtor's affidavit, t…
[2] A trial court errs by dissolving a writ of garnishment without a trial when the judgment debtor claims an exemption for wages and the creditor timely denies the facts sup…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“where a judgment debtor files an affidavit stating that the money attached is due for his labor and services and that he is the head of a family, if the facts set forth in such affidavit are timely denied by the party who sued out the process, as was done here, "then the matter shall be tried by the court from which the writ or process issued."”
Establishes the statutory requirement for a trial when wage exemption is claimed and facts are timely denied
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe bank obtained a $61,369.88 judgment against Richard Newberg, a stockbroker employed by Troster, Singer, Stevens, Rothchild Corp. A garnishment wri…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Counterclaim For Attorney'S Fees cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The Bank of Coral Gables (bank) appeals from final orders of the Circuit Court for Dade County dissolving an order of garnishment against appellee Troster, Singer, Stevens, Rothchild Corp. (garnishee), and an-order assessing attorney’s fees against the bank.
A garnishment proceeding was brought by the bank to collect on a $61,369.88 judgment it had been awarded against Richard L. Newberg, a stockbroker employed by the garnishee. Subsequently, a writ of garnishment was served upon the garnishee. The garnishee responded by letter that it held in a special account the sum of $42,470, representing commissions from trades made by Newberg, that $37,500 of the $42,470 was held by the garnishee as an offset against trading losses and that the actual amount Newberg could draw from the account was $4,970. The bank moved for the entry of final judgment against the garnishee. The garnishee filed an answer to the writ of garnishment and counterclaimed against the bank for attorney’s fees and costs. Newberg filed a motion to dissolve the writ of garnishment on the ground that the money attached was owed to Newberg for personal services and labor, and therefore exempt from garnishment as he was the head of a family residing in this state. See § 222.11, Fla.Stat. (1983).
He filed, together with such motion, an affidavit attesting that he was the head of a family residing in Florida, that the money attached was earnings from commissions for services rendered and that he was an employee of the garnishee. The bank filed an affidavit denying certain facts set out in Newberg’s affidavit. The bank alleged that the money in the account was derived from commissions earned by Newberg from his employment as an independent contractor for the garnishee.
The trial court held a hearing on the matter.
At the hearing, the bank sought a trial on all the issues.
The trial court denied the bank’s request and entered an order dissolving the writ of garnishment. The court also entered a second order taxing the garnishee’s attorney’s fees against the bank.
The dispositive point on appeal is whether the trial court erred in not proceeding to trial on all issues.
Section 222.12, Florida Statutes (1985), provides that where a judgment debtor files an affidavit stating that the money attached is due for his labor and services and that he is the head of a family, if the facts set forth in such affidavit are timely denied by the party who sued out the process, as was done here, “then the matter shall be tried by the court from which the writ or process issued.” See Elvine v. Public Finance Co., 196 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967).
We find merit in the bank’s contention that the trial court erred in its failure to grant a trial on all issues. Accordingly, the orders appealed are reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Cadle Co. v. G & G Assocs. & Peter L. Grieco, 757 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)…Grieco’s statement that the monies held by his employer constitute earnings subject to the exemption, at least as to some of those funds, Appellant was entitled to have the issue tried at an evi-dentiary hearing. See Bank of Coral Gables v. Newberg, 490 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Accordingly, we reverse the order granting Grieco’s motion to dissolve and remand with instructions to the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing to determine which of the monies held by Grieco’s employer are exempt under th…
Authorities Cited
- Elvine v. Pub. Fin. Co., 196 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)