JOSEPHINE DORSE, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE TO THE ESTATE OF ALFRED DORSE, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
JOSEPHINE DORSE, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE TO THE ESTATE OF ALFRED DORSE, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
837 F.2d 957
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge:
Following oral argument in this case, we certified a question of law to the Florida Supreme Court. Dorse v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., 798 F. 2d 1372 (1986). That opinion contains a summary of the facts, which need not be repeated here.
The Florida Supreme Court has now answered the certified question. Dorse v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., 513 So. 2d 1265 (Fla.1987). As the Florida Supreme Court has now held that a “military contractor’s defense” will be recognized in Florida law under certain specified circumstances, we vacate the previous district court’s opinion in this case, and remand to the district court for further consideration of the issues presented.
VACATED and REMANDED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dorse v. Eagle-Picher Indus., Inc., 898 F.2d 1487 (11th Cir. 1990)…rld Industries, 513 So. 2d 1265 (Fla.1987). The Florida court’s decision prompted the Eleventh Circuit to vacate this court’s earlier ruling and remanded the case for further consideration of the issue presented. Dorse v. Armstrong World Industries, 837 F. 2d 957 (11th Cir.1988). Following these decisions, the United States Supreme Court clarified the contours of the government contractor defense. I. In Boyle v. United Technologies Corp., 487 U.S. 500, 108 S.Ct. 2510, 101 L.Ed.2d 442 (1988), the Supreme Co…
-
Dorse v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 716 F. Supp. 589 (S.D. Fla. 1989)…stries, 513 So.2d 1265 (Fla.1987). The Florida court’s decision prompted the Eleventh Circuit to vacate this court’s earlier ruling and remanded the case for further consideration of the issue presented. Dorse v. Armstrong World Industries, 837 F.2d 957 (11th Cir.1988). Following these decisions, the United States Supreme Court clarified the con *590 tours of the government contractor defense. I. In Boyle v. United Technologies Corp., — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct 2510, 101 L.Ed.2d 442 (198…
Authorities Cited
- Dorse v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 798 F.2d 1372 (11th Cir. 1986)
- Dorse v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 513 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 1987)