CONNIE C. RESHARD AND LEROY RESHARD, CO-PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF MINNIE LEE RESHARD ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE AND CERTAIN SURVIVORS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
DR. EARL BRITT, DR. GEORGE BONK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
CONNIE C. RESHARD AND LEROY RESHARD, CO-PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF MINNIE LEE RESHARD ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE AND CERTAIN SURVIVORS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
DR. EARL BRITT, DR. GEORGE BONK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
831 F.2d 222
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1987)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court in banc without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Devine v. Indian River Cnty. Sch. Bd., 121 F.3d 576 (11th Cir. 1997)…of courts to address this question have found that jurisdiction is proper. Compare Reshard v. Britt, 819 F. 2d 1573 (11th Cir.) (holds order denying personal representatives of estate from representing estate pro se immediately appealable), vacated, 831 F. 2d 222 (11th Cir.1987), affirming district court by equally divided court, 839 F. 2d 1499 (11th Cir.1988) (en banc); C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States, 818 F. 2d 696 (9th Cir.1987) (without discussion, holds order striking trustee’s pro se pleadings…1 / 2
-
Reshard v. Britt, 839 F.2d 1499 (11th Cir. 1988)…of Minnie Reshard’s estate and survivors. A panel of this Court reversed in a divided decision. Reshard v. Britt, 819 F. 2d 1573 (11th Cir.1987). The Court took this case in banc, which resulted in the panel opinion being vacated. Reshard v. Britt, 831 F. 2d 222 (11th Cir.1987). The judges of the in banc court are equally divided on the proper disposition of this case. Therefore, the order of the district court is AFFIRMED as a matter of law. See Henderson v. Fort Worth Independent School District, 584 F.…
-
In re Grand Jury Proceedings-Subpoena to State Attorney's Off. Thomas H. Greene, 832 F.2d 554 (11th Cir. 1987)…her, nonprivileged material. In the latter situation, the case is not ripe for appellate review until the subpoenaed party has actually been asked to reveal specific material covered by the asserted privilege. See In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Doe), 831 F. 2d 222 (11th Cir.1987). . We should emphasize that this discussion relates only to appellants’ right to appeal under the Perlman exception. It does not relate to their standing to raise these claims before the district court. . The remainder of section 9…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence