BETTYE GRINDLE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1986-04-15
No. 85-40
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARK-DULL and NESBITT, JJ.
486 So. 2d 689 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1986) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Coffey, 212 So. 2d 632 (Fla.1968); State v. T.L.W., 457 So. 2d 566 (Fla.2d DCA 1984); Adams v. State, 448 So. 2d 1201 (Fla.3d DCA 1984); Grala v. State, 414 So. 2d 621 (Fla.3d DCA 1982); Elder v. Robert J. Ackerman, Inc., 362 So. 2d 999 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Interest of B.S. v. State, 320 So. 2d 459 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Chenard v. State, 510 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
    …SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge. Upon our remand for resentencing in Chenard v. State, 486 So. 2d 689 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), the trial court again departed upward from the guidelines. The defendant again appeals and we again reverse on the ground that none of the reasons assigned is an acceptable basis for deviation. Chenard was convicted on a guilty…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw