RICHARD E. LEWIS, APPELLANT,
v.
BRENDA M. LEWIS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the aspects of the dissolution judgment regarding child custody, property division, and alimony, but reversed the award of attorney's fees to the wife.
The husband appealed a supplemental final judgment of dissolution of marriage which awarded the wife custody of the children, the husband's interest i…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Division Of Marital Property cases and more on FLexlaw
RYDER, Chief Judge.
Richard E. Lewis appeals a supplemental final judgment of dissolution of marriage. The court’s order gave the wife custody of the two minor children, the husband’s one-half interest in the marital home, lump sum alimony, and attorney’s fees. We affirm all aspects of the court’s judgment except for the attorney’s fees award.
In affirming three of the husband’s four points on appeal, we recognize that this is a close case. It is for that very reason that we decline to find the trial judge abused his discretion in awarding custody to the wife and in the division of the parties’ marital property. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980).
However, we do find that the trial judge abused his discretion in awarding attorney’s fees to the wife. The record amply reflects that the wife had the financial ability to obtain competent legal counsel and, by doing so, was not in danger of suffering an inequitable diminution of her economic status or security. See Wenz v. Collings, 417 So. 2d 318, 319 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). Therefore, we reverse that portion of the final judgment which ordered the husband to pay the wife’s attorney’s fees. In this matter, the wife must be responsible for the payment of her attorney’s fees.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
GRIMES and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)
- Novella Nora Tucker v. State, 417 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)