ROSENBLATT, GREENE & ARNOWITZ, P.A. AND STANLEY ROSENBLATT: CONROY & SIMBERG AND BRUCE SIMBERG, APPELLANTS,
v.
GENE FLINN; BETTY VADALA, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF REBECCA VADALA, DECEASED, APPELLEES
ROSENBLATT, GREENE & ARNOWITZ, P.A. AND STANLEY ROSENBLATT: CONROY & SIMBERG AND BRUCE SIMBERG, APPELLANTS,
GENE FLINN; BETTY VADALA, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF REBECCA VADALA, DECEASED, APPELLEES
485 So. 2d 484
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1986)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Finding that appellants were not afforded basic due process requirements of notice and opportunity to be heard, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. Quay Development, Inc. v. Elegante Building Corp., 392 So. 2d 901 (Fla.1981); Shaw v. Shaw, 455 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Der Hagopian v. In re Guardianship of Marie Zimmer, 653 So. 2d 474 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…2d 901 (Fla.1981) (citing Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 70 S.Ct. 652, 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950)); Bryant v. Department of Professional Regulation, 603 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Rosenblatt, Greene & Arnowitz, P.A v. Flinn, 485 So. 2d 484 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). The person whose name appears on legal title is presumed to be the owner of the property in question. Cannova v. Carran, 92 So. 2d 614, 619 (Fla.1957). Where an asset is held jointly, there is a strong presumption of [*476] join…
Authorities Cited
- THE Florida BAR v. Singer, 392 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 1981)
- Shaw v. Shaw, 455 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)