IN RE FORFEITURE OF $2,000 IN U.S. CURRENCY. LAWSON L. LAMAR, SHERIFF OF ORANGE COUNTY, APPELLANT,
v.
CHARLES SYPIEN, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Trial court erred in setting aside default judgment in forfeiture action where appellee failed to answer complaint despite proper service and failed to demonstrate excusable neglect.
To set aside a default judgment, a movant must establish both a valid defense and excusable neglect, and the record must affirmatively show excusable neglect.
[1] To set aside a default judgment in a forfeiture proceeding, the movant must establish both a valid defense and excusable neglect for failure to timely respond to the comp…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellant sheriff brought a forfeiture action under Florida Statutes 932.701-932.704 for $2,000 found in a suspicious package at Orlando International…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Civil Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
DAUKSCH, Judge.
The trial court erred in setting aside the default entered by the clerk and denying appellant’s motion for judgment of default. The appellant brought an action for forfeiture, pursuant to Florida Statutes 932.701-932.704, of $2,000 found in a suspicious package at the Orlando International Airport. Appellee, the sender of the package, was given proper notice and was personally served in court with the complaint requiring an answer within twenty days. The complaint and notice of forfeiture proceedings were prepared in compliance with Florida Statute 932.704 and this court’s decision in In Re: Forfeiture of One 1976 Chevrolet Corvette, V1N1Z37L6541240, 442 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), pet. for rev. den. 451 So. 2d 849 (Fla.1984). When appellee did not answer, the appellant obtained a default entered by the clerk.
To set aside a judgment of default the movant must set forth a valid defense and show excusable neglect. TPM Constructors, Inc. v. Twin Coast Title, Inc., 425 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 5th DCA), pet. for rev. den. 434 So. 2d 889 (Fla.1983). The trial court stated that appellee had set forth a valid defense. However, there is nothing in the record which establishes the existence of excusable neglect. The order is quashed and this cause remanded for entry of judgment for appellant.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- In re Forfeiture OF ONE 1976 Chevrolet Corvette v. Karin Hayes, 442 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)
- TPM Constructors, Inc. v. Twin Coast Title, Inc., 425 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)