EDGAR E. OLIVER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT AND JIM SMITH, RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES; EDGAR E. OLIVER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V. LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

11th Cir. | 1986-12-03
Nos. 84-5821, 84-5911
Before FAY, CLARK and NIES , Circuit Judges.
805 F.2d 371 Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1986)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

(Opinion August 11, 1986, 11 Cir., 1986, 795 F. 2d 1524)

PER CURIAM:

Subsequent to our opinion of August 11, 1986, and in its Petition for Rehearing, the state concedes that there was no appeal-able state court order on Oliver’s application for relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850, State Petition for Rehearing at 9.

The state urges that we hold our opinion in abeyance pending Oliver’s exhaustion of his state remedy. The state by a supplemental filing has sent an order of the state trial court denying Oliver Rule 3.850 relief.

We determine that this matter should be finalized insofar as our court is concerned. The Petition for Rehearing is DENIED. The parties may seek such further relief as they deem necessary in the federal court system after completion of the state court proceeding.

DENIED.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw