UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
HAROLD JOSEPH ROSENTHAL, PHILIP ANTHONY BONADONNA, ROBERT EDWARD DUNLEAVY, JR., GEORGE LOMBARDI, GARLAND HUBERT WATSON, LARRY ROGER STEWART, JOSEPH VINCENT JUNKER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, V. ROSE MARIE JUNKER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. DENNIS WAYNE WILSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
In our opinion United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F. 2d 1214 (11th Cir.1986), Appellant Harold Rosenthal’s conviction on Count Thirteen, conspiracy to import cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 963, was vacated due to said offense merging with his § 848 conviction and sentence.
In his motion for modification of opinion, Appellant Bonadonna argues that his conviction for the same offense should be vacated in light of Bonadonna’s adoption of the arguments asserted by his co-appellants. An examination of the record discloses that Bonadonna, with respect to his § 963 conviction, is in the same posture as Rosenthal. Accordingly, Bonadonna’s conviction and sentence under Count Thirteen must be, and hereby is, VACATED. United States v. Harrington, 761 F. 2d 1482 (11th Cir.1985).
PER CURIAM:
Petitions for rehearing filed by Joseph Vincent Junker, George Lombardi, and Harold Joseph Rosenthal are DENIED. The petition for rehearing filed by Philip Anthony Bonadonna, except to the extent previously granted is DENIED. No member of this panel nor other judge in regular active service on the court having requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 26), the suggestions for rehearing en banc filed by George Lombardi, Philip Anthony Bonadon-na, Harold Joseph Rosenthal and Rose Marie Junker, are DENIED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (20 total)
-
Errico v. State, 608 So. 2d 930 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)…in the course of his interrogation. Upon a review of the record, we find no error in the denial of appellant’s motion to suppress. United States v. Mitro, 880 F. 2d 1480 (1st Cir. 1989); United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F. 2d 1214, opinion modified, 801 F. 2d 378 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919, 107 S.Ct. 1377, 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987); United States v. Martindale, 790 F. 2d 1129 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 855, 107 S.Ct. 193, 93 L.Ed.2d 125 (1986); United States v. Covington, 783 F. 2d 1052…
-
United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384 (D.C. Cir. 1988)…hich government would inform sentencing judge of “value to the Government” of defendant’s testimony and make a recommendation based upon a “subjective evaluation by the Government of the nature and scope” of cooperation), modified in different part, 801 F. 2d 378 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 1377, 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987). Although conditioning the sentencing recommendation on the “value” of the witness’ testimony may in some cases create a greater incentive to lie, the likelihood of perju…
-
United States v. Baptista-Rodriguez, 17 F.3d 1354 (11th Cir. 1994)…government official is not a defense in this circuit, because it is deemed a mistake of law, which generally does not excuse criminal conduct. Anderson, 872 F. 2d at 1515; United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F. 2d 1214, 1236, modified on other grounds, 801 F. 2d 378 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919, 107 S.Ct. 1377, 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987). A defendant legitimately may rely, however, on a government official's real authority to authorize the defendant’s conduct. Anderson, 872 F. 2d at 1515; Rosenthal,…
Previewing 3 of 20 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214 (11th Cir. 1986)
- United States v. Harrington, 761 F.2d 1482 (11th Cir. 1985)