ALPHONSO CANTY, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• McKAY v. State, 504 So. 2d 1280 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
  …n its conclusion that, where the defendant does not dispute the truth of the listed convictions, the state is not required to come forward with corroboration thereof. Wright v. State, 476 So. 2d 325, 327 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). See also Stacey v. State, 483 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Baker v. State, 493 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Olivera v. State, 494 So. 2d 298 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Affirmed. SHIVERS and JOANOS, JJ„ concur.…
• Minnis v. State, 505 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …orroboration. See Brown v. State, 473 So. 2d 1260, 1266 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 607, 88 L.Ed.2d 585 (1985); Eutsey v. State, 383 So. 2d 219 (Fla.1980); Thompson v. State, 478 So. 2d 462, 464 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); cf Stacey v. State, 483 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (Where defendant disputes the truthfulness of the statements concerning prior convictions and state offers no corroboration whatever, remand for corroboration is required.); Morris v. State, 483 So. 2d 525 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986) (sa…
• Camp v. State, 501 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
  …ial judge should have directed the state to produce corroborating evidence concerning appellant’s prior convictions and his parole status at the time of commission of the instant offenses. Eutsey v. State, 383 So. 2d 219 (Fla.1980); Stacey v. State, 483 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Davis v. State, 463 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). A valid hearsay objection cannot be overcome by the expedient of having the proponent of the hearsay (in this case, the PSI/score-sheet preparer) simply repeat his hearsay evid…

Authorities Cited

• Lowery v. State, 450 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)