SOLOMON DAVID ROBERTS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1986-02-18
No. 86-3
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and DANIEL PEARSON, JJ.
483 So. 2d 504 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1986)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that appellant is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed. Smith v. State, 445 So. 2d 323 (Fla.1983); Runyon v. State, 460 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Whitchard v. State, 459 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Rosemond v. State, 433 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Snow v. State, 399 So. 2d 466 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Beck v. Wainwright, 381 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw