FIRST ALABAMA BANK OF MONTGOMERY, N.A. AND EDWARD HERBERT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES.
v.
PARSONS STEEL, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, A. POPE GORDON, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY FOR THE ESTATE OF PARSONS STEEL, INC., PARSONS STEEL, INC., JIM D. PARSONS AND MELBA L. PARSONS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
FIRST ALABAMA BANK OF MONTGOMERY, N.A. AND EDWARD HERBERT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES.
PARSONS STEEL, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, A. POPE GORDON, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY FOR THE ESTATE OF PARSONS STEEL, INC., PARSONS STEEL, INC., JIM D. PARSONS AND MELBA L. PARSONS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
785 F.2d 929
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1986)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The district court judgment in this case was affirmed by this court in First Alabama Bank v. Parsons Steel, Inc., 747 F. 2d 1367 (11th Cir.1984). The judgment of this court has now been reversed by the Supreme Court of the United States. Parsons Steel, Inc v. First Alabama Bank, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 768, 88 L.Ed.2d 877 (1986).
WHEREUPON IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is reversed, and this cause is remanded to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appellants recover from appellees their costs on this appeal.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sweet v. Sec'y, Dep't OF Corr., Attorney Gen., State of Fla., 467 F.3d 1311 (11th Cir. 2006)…(2) the state engaged in invidious discrimination against him based on race, religion, national origin, or some other constitutionally protected basis. Jones v. Ray, 279 F. 3d 944, 946-47 (11th Cir.2001); Damiano v. Florida Parole and Prob. Comm’n, 785 F. 2d 929, 932-33 (11th Cir.1986). Sweet’s equal protection claim necessarily fails first because he has not shown that he was treated differently from other, similarly situated prisoners. Sweet cites seven cases from the Supreme Court of Florida where, he…
-
C.T. Akins v. Snow, 922 F.2d 1558 (11th Cir. 1991)…t held that “as a matter of law, the postponement of reconsideration for parole is not a punishment subject to the ex post facto clause.” Id. The district court based its ex post facto ruling upon Damiano v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 785 F. 2d 929 (11th Cir.1986), in which this court held that parole postponement is “merely a disappointment rather than a punishment_” Id. at 933.7 Akins and Fate only appeal the district court’s ruling relating to their ex post facto claim. II. DISCUSSION An…
-
Jones v. RAY, 279 F.3d 944 (11th Cir. 2001)…monstrate that (1) “he is similarly situated with other prisoners who received” more favorable treatment; and (2) his discriminatory treatment was based on some constitutionally protected interest such as race. Damiano v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm’n, 785 F. 2d 929, 932-33 (11th Cir.1986) (per curiam). Jones did not set forth any facts in support of his allegations. Even a liberal interpretation of this pro se pleading does not reveal any factual basis for an equal protection claim. Thus, we affirm the grant…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Parsons Steel, Inc. v. First Ala. Bank, 474 U.S. 518 (U.S. 1986)
- First Ala. Bank OF Montgomery, N.A. v. Parsons Steel, Inc., 747 F.2d 1367 (11th Cir. 1984)