WILLIS A. HOGWOOD, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co. v. Pickard, 573 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
  …reseeable. Layden v. Corrections Corporation of America, 570 So. 2d 994 (1st DCA 1990). The court stated: Ordinarily the question of whether an intervening cause was foreseeable is for the trier of fact. Our Lady of Divine Providence v. Sweetwater, 482 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Only when reasonable persons could not differ as to whether an intervening cause was foreseeable may the court determine the issue as a matter of law. 482 So. 2d at 442. Here, reasonable persons could differ in their determinatio…
• Layden v. Corr. Corp. OF Am., 570 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
  …onduct of Layden’s attorney was not foreseeable, thus the trial court correctly relieved it of liability. Ordinarily the question of whether an intervening cause was foreseeable is for the trier of fact. Our Lady of Divine Providence v. Sweetwater, 482 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Only when reasonable persons could not differ as to whether an intervening cause was foreseeable may the court determine the issue as a matter of law. 482 So. 2d at 442. Here, reasonable persons could differ in their determinatio…
• State v. Kropff, 491 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
  …munity may be raised at any time. Moore v. City of St. Petersburg, 281 So. 2d 549 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 289 So. 2d 730 (Fla.1973). Appellee’s contention that footnote two in Our Lady of Divine Providence Catholic Church v. City of Sweetwater, 482 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), stands for the proposition that sovereign immunity may not be considered for the first time on appeal, misinterprets such footnote. In Our Lady, this court elected merely to have the trial court consider sovereign immunity on rem…

Authorities Cited

• Valdes v. State, 443 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)