DCA HOMES, INC., F/K/A OAK HILL HOMES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

CITY OF MIRAMAR, FLORIDA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND BROWARD COUNTY PLANNING COUNCIL, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Robby Douglas Pugh v. State, 547 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
  …at 309. Cf. Winters v. State, 500 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (wherein the trial court stated specific facts and circumstances relied on in concluding that defendant’s criminal history indicated he was a danger to the community); White v. State, 481 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (wherein the trial court analyzed defendant’s conduct and noted that it demonstrated a conscious pattern of lawlessness). Accordingly, we vacate the trial court’s habitual offender finding and reverse and remand for resentencing…
• Sims v. State, 487 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)
  …on its face, show that the public is at risk absent an extended sentence. Moreover, reference to appellant’s “continuing criminal activity” is inadequate without additional analysis or findings of fact in support. See Berry. Compare White v. State, 481 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986), where we held the judge made sufficient findings to support an enhanced sentence in analyzing the defendant’s conduct and noting that it demonstrated a conscious pattern of lawlessness. Next, appellant correctly points out that…
• Berry v. State, 484 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)
  …15 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). As in Scott and Fleming, this trial judge’s stated reason for sentencing the defendant as an habitual offender is insufficient. See also Wright v. State, 476 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). We recognize that in White v. State, 481 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986), we held a trial judge’s sentencing of a defendant as an habitual offender was proper where the judge analyzed the defendant’s conduct and concluded that it demonstrated a conscious pattern of lawlessness. Unlike White, the record…