UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
L.J. GARNER AND TOMMIE N. GARNER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
L.J. GARNER AND TOMMIE N. GARNER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
752 F.2d 116
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1985)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Supplementing our earlier opinion in United States v. Garner, 749 F. 2d 281 (5th Cir.1985), we note sua sponte that the district court, 567 F.Supp. 313, may wish to consider, in addition to the alternative already suggested in our earlier opinion, reentering the interlocutory order and thus triggering a new ten-day period for the government to pursue an appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). See Aucoin v. Matador Services, Inc., 749 F. 2d 1180 (5th Cir.1985); Aparicio v. Swan Lake, 643 F. 2d 1109 (5th Cir.1981). In the event that an appeal is so perfected, see § 1292(b); Fed.R.App.P. 5, there will be no necessity for further briefing, and the appeal will be referred to this panel for disposition.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
N. Miss. Sav. & Loan Ass'n & New N. Miss. Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Hudspeth, 756 F.2d 1096 (5th Cir. 1985)
-
State OF Cal. v. Am. Stores Co., 872 F.2d 837 (9th Cir. 1989)
-
United States v. L.J. Garner and Tommie N. Garner, 767 F.2d 104 (5th Cir. 1985)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Aparicio v. Swan Lake, 643 F.2d 1109 (5th Cir. 1981)
- Burns v. E.I. DuPONT De Nemours & Co., 749 F.2d 281 (5th Cir. 1985)
- United States v. L.J. Garner and Tommie N. Garner, 749 F.2d 281 (5th Cir. 1985)
- Aucoin v. Matador Servs., Inc., 749 F.2d 1180 (5th Cir. 1985)