LILLIAN KRAL, APPELLANT,
v.
SISTERS OF THE THIRD ORDER REGULAR OF ST. FRANCIS OF THE CONGREGATION OF OUR LADY OF LOURDES, APPELLEE

8th Cir. | 1984-10-17
No. 84-5048
746 F.2d 450 United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (1984)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that secular courts cannot review a claim of violation of hierarchical church law once rejected by the church's judicial authorities.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff alleged wrongful expulsion from a religious order, claiming mental illness at the time. The church's highest court found she was not mentall…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the District Court’s1 dismissal of a complaint alleging that the defendant, an order of sisters in the Roman Catholic Church, had wrongfully expelled the plaintiff from membership. We affirm.

The theory of the complaint is that the plaintiff was mentally ill at the time of her expulsion, and that canon law prohibits expulsion in this situation. Plaintiff’s case was considered by the highest church court of competent jurisdiction before her expulsion took place, and that court found that she was not mentally ill. Whatever the merits of that finding as a matter of fact, it is not within our province to review it. A claim of violation of the law of a hierarchical church, once rejected by the church’s judicial authorities, is not subject to revision in the secular courts. See, e.g., Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese v. Milivojevich, 426 U.S. 696, 712, 96 S.Ct, 2372, 2381, 49 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976).

We are in substantial agreement with the District Court’s well-reasoned opinion. See 8th Cir.R. 14.

. The Hon. Edward J. Devitt, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw