UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,

v.

WILLIAM HOWARD CROSS, SR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

Citator

Cited By

• Honorable Linda Singer Stein v. Prof'l Ctr., S.A., 666 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
  …er grounds, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); United States v. Crouch, 566 F. 2d 1311, 1316 (5th Cir. 1978); Morrison v. Kimmelman, 650 F.Supp. 801, 805-06 (D.N.J.1986); United States v. Cross, 516 F.Supp. 700 (M.D.Ga.1981), affd, 742 F. 2d 1279 (11th Cir.1984); Standard Packaging Corp. v. Curwood, Inc., 365 F.Supp. 134 (N.D.I11.1973); Brown v. Brown, 497 P. 2d 718 (Colo.Ct.App. 1972); Gold v. Warden, State Prison, 222 Conn. 312, 610 A. 2d 1153, 1156-58 (1992); Emerickv. Emerick, 28 Conn.Ap…
• Cross v. United States, 893 F.2d 1287 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …and remanded by the Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of Hobby v. United States, 468 U.S. 339, 104 S.Ct. 3093, 82 L.Ed.2d 260 (1984). Subsequently, this court vacated its former judgment and affirmed the conviction. United States v. Cross, 742 F. 2d 1279 (11th Cir.1984). Appellant then filed the present motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 raising thirteen claims of error. While the motion was pending, Cross filed a second § 2255 pleading raising the same issues. The motions were consolidat…
• United States v. Rivera, 802 F.2d 593 (2d Cir. 1986)
  …of judicially provoked mistrials under the Kennedy standard, albeit without extensive analysis. See United States v. Mitchell, 736 F. 2d 1299, 1304 (9th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 94, 88 L.Ed.2d 77 (1985); United States v. Miller, 742 F. 2d 1279, 1285 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1216, 105 S.Ct. 1194, 84 L.Ed.2d 340 (1985). Appellants, on the other hand, urge that a judge should be held to a more exacting standard than a prosecutor, because the judge’s function is to ensure a fa…

Authorities Cited

• Hobby v. United States, 468 U.S. 339 (U.S. 1984)
• United States v. Cross, 708 F.2d 631 (11th Cir. 1983)