HARRY JAMES GORMLY, JR., OWNER OF THE SAILING YACHT, "FANTASY", IN AN ACTION FOR EXONERATION FROM AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AND OTHER CLAIMS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
SCHUYLER VAN INGEN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES; SCHUYLER VAN INGEN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, V. MARINA MOTOR INN ENTERPRISES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, D/B/A MARINA INN & YACHT HARBOR AND GARY COIT, DEFENDANTS, HARRY JAMES GORMLY, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Non-settling defendants are liable to the plaintiff for their percentage of negligence applied to the total damages, without a dollar credit for a prior settlement with another defendant.
Two yachts collided while one was moored at a marina. A passenger on the moored yacht sued the owners of both yachts and the marina for personal injur…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Contribution (Law) cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
These consolidated admiralty suits arose out of a collision between sailing yacht “FANTASY” and sailing yacht “SPIRIT OF PIPIT” [“PIPIT”]. At the time of the collision the “PIPIT” was moored at a marina owned and operated by defendant Marina Motor Inn Enterprises, Inc. [“Marina”], d/b/a Marina Inn and Yacht Harbor, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Harry James Gormly, Jr., owner of “FANTASY,” sued for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability and, in the alternative, sought contri bution from the Marina and Gary Coit, the owner of “PIPIT:
Schuyler Van Ingen sought damages from Marina, Coit and Gormly for personal injuries sustained by him in the collision.
The limitation of liability action was mooted by a settlement between Van Ingen and Gormly. Under the terms of the agreement, Gormly and Lloyds (Gormly’s insurer) agreed to pay Van Ingen $100,-000.00 in settlement of all Van Ingen’s claims against Gormly, “FANTASY” and Lloyds. Following trial to the court, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law were entered. The district court found Marina, Coit and Gormly negligent and assessed damages at $60,000.00. The negligence was apportioned as follows:
Yacht “FANTASY” — Gormly — 65%
Marina — 30%
Yacht “SPIRIT OF PIPIT” —Coit — 5%
The district court entered final judgment in favor of Van Ingen and against Coit in the sum of $3,000.00 and in favor of Van Ingen and against Marina in the sum of $18,000.00. No judgment was entered on Gormly’s claim for contribution. The court concluded the non-settling defendants, Marina and Coit, were not entitled to a dollar credit on the $100,000.00 settlement Van Ingen made with Gormly. We agree and on the basis of Leger v. Drilling Well Control, Inc., 592 F. 2d 1246 (5th Cir.1979)1 hold that the non-settling defendants were liable to plaintiff Van Ingen to the extent of their percentage of negligence as applied to the total damages to plaintiff as found by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has adopted the case law of the former Fifth Circuit as its governing body of precedent. This precedent is binding unless and until overruled or modified by this Court en banc. Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F. 2d 1206, 1209-11 (11th Cir.1981) (en banc).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Self v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co., 832 F.2d 1540 (11th Cir. 1987)…or his injuries, even though the injuries amounted to only $284,090.00. Similarly, in the primary Eleventh Circuit case to follow Leger, the plaintiff received $121,000 in compensation although his damages were only $60,000. See Gormly v. Van Ingen, 736 F. 2d 624, 625 (11th Cir.1983). The Leger court overlooked in its calculations that Travelers Insurance Company received $82,331 of the $127,840 received by Leger from Dresser, leaving Leger with $246,321 ($63,920 balance plus $182,331 initially paid by Trave…
-
Drake Towing Co., Inc. v. Meisner Marine Constr. Co., 765 F.2d 1060 (11th Cir. 1985)…ent of their respective percentages of negligence as applied to the plaintiff’s total damages without any credit for the sum by which the settling defendants’ payments exceed the settling defendants’ proportionate liability. See Gormly v. Van Ingen, 736 F. 2d 624, 625 (11th Cir.1983). Leger does not answer the question now before us, which is whether the trial court may decrease the liability of a defendant that is at trial by considering the negligence of a tortfeasor that is not. Ebanks v. Great Lakes D…
-
Complaint of Chevron Transp. Corp., 613 F. Supp. 1428 (M.D. Fla. 1985)…case the question of the amount of plaintiff's recovery arises. The court is of the opinion that the present case is governed by the principles set forth in Leger v. Drilling Well Control, Inc., 592 F.2d 1246 (5th Cir.1979). See Gormly v. Van Ingen, 736 F.2d 624 (11th Cir.1983) (per curiam affirmance applying Leger).[3] In Leger an employee was injured while working aboard a barge. He sued three separate defendants but settled with two of the defendants prior to trial. At trial the jury apportioned fault a…
Authorities Cited
- Bonner v. City OF Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981)
- Leger v. Drilling Well Control, Inc., 592 F.2d 1246 (5th Cir. 1979)